The Engineering Section supports the WQCD mission by ensuring drinking water and domestic wastewater infrastructure is safely designed and operated. To help stakeholders navigate the review process for drinking water and domestic wastewater projects, we are highlighting our online tracking tools and the importance of timely responses to Requests for Information (RFI).
Enhanced Project Visibility
The Engineering Section maintains a public-facing Project Status Page that tracks every design application currently in our system. This tool is designed to give you full visibility into your submittal's journey. By using this page, you can identify:
- Your Review Team: Quickly identify the assigned Review Engineer and the Quality Control (QC) Engineer for your specific project.
- Active Projects: See which projects are currently under review by our engineering staff or if we are waiting for more information from the applicant.
- Backlog/Awaiting Payment: Projects only enter the backlog once invoices are paid (if applicable). These are queued and awaiting staff availability.
- Historic Projects: This includes a record of projects that have been completed, closed, or canceled.
By checking these status updates regularly, you can better estimate your project’s timeline and ensure the "ball" isn't accidentally left in your court.
Why Timely Responses Matter
A critical part of the technical review is the Request for Information (RFI), which our engineers use to seek clarification or additional details to ensure the design meets Department Design Criteria.
To keep our review queue accurate and focused on construction-ready projects, we are implementing a new administrative update:
- Important: If a project remains in an "Awaiting More Info" status for more than 120 days without communication, the project will be flagged and may be closed out in the future.
What this means for you:
- Project Closure: If an RFI goes unanswered for over four months, the project will be flagged for potential closure. Additional communications will be sent to the applicant alerting them of the need to respond.
- The Resubmission Requirement: If a project is closed, it cannot be "reopened." To move forward, the applicant must resubmit a new design application, which includes paying new application fees (if applicable) and restarting the review at the back of the current queue.
- Stay Updated: We will always notify entities before closing a project for lack of response, but the best way to avoid delays is to respond to RFIs as soon as possible.
Keeping the Queue Moving
Responding promptly helps us all. Idle projects make it difficult to forecast workloads and assign resources to those ready for construction.
Our ask to you:
- Check your status: Regularly visit our Project Status Page.
- Respond Promptly: Aim to address RFI comments as soon as they are received.
- Stay in Touch: If you anticipate a delay in responding to an RFI, contact your assigned reviewer to keep the Department updated.
We value your partnership in protecting Colorado’s water resources. Let’s work together to keep the application process flowing smoothly.






