In 2024 we celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Safe Drinking Water Act signed by President Ford in 1974. This landmark legislation set unified standards for water systems across the United States to protect public health. The Act set up a now time-tested framework in which EPA largely sets the rules and requirements via a defined process and with stakeholder input, and then states implement via primacy. As our work to improve public health continues, what factors and principles do we need to consider on our path through the next 25 to 50 years?
In December 2024, I had the opportunity to participate in and speak at a symposium at the University of Wisconsin on just this topic. The symposium was sponsored by the Water and Health Advisory Council, a multidisciplinary group of water professionals involved in drinking water and public health protection. The title of the symposium was: The Next 50 Years of Drinking Water in America. I participated in the “Prioritizing Risk” panel.
Two of the risk reduction opportunities were identified as legionella and manganese. The upcoming federal revisions to the microbial and disinfection byproducts (M/DBP) rules should help us to start addressing legionella. Legionella is now a major cause of waterborne disease outbreaks, and the illness is sometimes fatal. At this point in time, it does not appear that a rule to address manganese is in the pipeline. Manganese has a health advisory, and some nervous system health risks similar to lead. However, another big risk was identified as losing the progress we have made due to aging infrastructure. Attendees were particularly concerned about distribution systems. Again, the M/DBP rules may help with some operational aspects of those, but the overall drinking water infrastructure situation is a serious concern.
Are we approaching a time when affordability, especially for small systems, will jeopardize the ability to comply with rules for new contaminants and keep up with the fundamental infrastructure that a safe water supply relies on? Many people believe that we have already passed a tipping point in that regard and that small systems face truly daunting challenges over the next few decades.
So the question arises, how do we (as individuals, communities, states and a nation) pay for safe drinking water? It appears that all options need to be on the table. Currently, the Drinking Water State Revolving Funds that involve large infusions of federal dollars combined with the state programs that operate them and keep the money “revolving” through more and more loans is a great help, especially for small, rural communities. But this funding source is not enough. How much more funding can be gained from state and federal sources? Should we be exploring more public/private partnerships? Should drinking water be treated like education where small, rural systems are supported from the broader state population? What about individual assistance programs, like those that occur for power utility bills?
The answers to these questions are not known at present, but it’s important to ask them and work on solutions for the next decade and beyond. Look for more information about the next 50 years in drinking water in this space throughout 2025. Thank you in advance for your efforts to keep drinking water safe for the next half a century!
➽ Ron Falco, P.E. Safe Drinking Water Program Manager
